The ethical issues on the stanford prison experiment

The prisoners were "arrested" at their homes and "charged" with armed robbery. I brought joints with me, and every day I wanted to give them to the prisoners. The instrumental egalitarian values equality as a means to some independently specifiable goal; the non-instrumental egalitarian values equality for its own sake—as an end, or as partly constitutive of some end.

British ‘replication’ of the Stanford Prison Experiment – new publications

Not surprisingly, many critics believe that Zimbardo should have halted his experiment as soon as the first physical altercation between a prison guard and prisoner took place. The proposal is that society should sustain basic capability equality.

An egalitarian might rather be one who maintains that people ought to be treated as equals—as possessing equal fundamental worth and dignity and as equally morally considerable. Equality of opportunity requires that jobs in economic firms and options to borrow money for investment purposes such as starting a business should be open to all applicants, that applications be assessed by relevant criteria of merit, and that the top-ranked applicant should be offered the job or option to borrow.

Discussion Questions

Human good, also known as welfare or well-being or utility, is what an individual gets insofar as her life goes well for herself ParfitAppendix I. At this point the advocate of an equality of condition doctrine in the luck egalitarian range may see an opening.

Twisted But True in the documentary short "Creative Evil".

What are the Zimbardo Prison Experiment Ethical Issues?

Mattresses were a valued item in the prison, so the guards would punish prisoners by removing their mattresses, leaving them to sleep on concrete. Consider the capability to be free of malaria, which opens many malaria-free life options, when the capability is obtained by public health measures beyond the power of the individual agent to control.

One might hold that equality in the distribution of resources among a group of persons is valuable, but only on the condition that the individuals are equally deserving. Would it be better if these studies had never been done. Respect for persons dictates that the state must respect its citizens by not looking beyond resource shares to assess what individuals can do with them and actually do with them Carter The same is true of the relational equality ideal.

Consider all of the different ways that one might function variously. Knowing what this research says about the power of prison situations to have a corrosive effect on human nature, what recommendations would you make about changing the correctional system in your country. What Haslam and Reicher attempted to challenge was the effects of social theory in the initial experiment.

Stanford prison experiment

Extending the domain in this way will introduce complexity into the account, because personal talents are attached to persons and cannot simply be transferred to others who lack talent. Most luck is a bit of both. How should a society committed to an ideal of equality of condition handle this type of issue.

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Unethical situations run rampant in the correctional system and we will visit the Stanford Prison Experiment to ponder some of these issues. Leaving these complications in the background, one can appreciate that having money gives one effective freedom to engage in a wide variety of activities and experiences.

Rather, the SPE serves as a cautionary tale of what might happen to any of us if we underestimate the extent to which the power of social roles and external pressures can influence our actions.

He was unable to remain a neutral observersince he influenced the direction of the experiment as the prison's superintendent. An Independent Ethics Panel composed of: The team selected the 24 applicants whose test results predicted they would be the most psychologically stable and healthy.

Zimbardo took on the role of the superintendent, and an undergraduate research assistant the role of the warden.

Stanford prison experiment

Or whether they can work together as a group to form a collective resistance to beat the guards altogether. Guards had differing responses to their new roles. For example, the laws may forbid the sale of sexual activity, human organs intended for transplant, the right to become a parent of a particular child by adoption, narcotic drugs, and so on.

What is "reality" in a prison setting. Michael Walzer is one who appears to take the latter view. Zimbardo A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison. Craig Haney, Curtis Banks and Philip Zimbardo () Link to Zimbardo's web-site. Americans For Innovation timeline and supporting facts showing dereliction of duty, fraud, corruption, the appearance of corruption, racketeering, monopoly and anti-trust by senior United States government officials, Harvard and Stanford academics, judges, law firms and their commercial accomplices.

Oct 02,  · Results of one of the most well-known psychology experiments in history may have been dramatically distorted by Milgram. Milgram's obedience experiment is one of the most famous studies in psychology's history. Learn what it revealed and the moral questions it raised.

Two key lessons emerge from history and psychology. One is that we must examine tyranny and resistance in tandem, never letting our concern with the one lead us to forget about the other.

The second is that groups might sometimes be a source of tyranny, but they are always central to resistance. Jul 16,  · An image taken from the Stanford Prison Experiment inwhich was conducted by the psychologist Philip Zimbardo. Credit Credit michaelferrisjr.com

The ethical issues on the stanford prison experiment
Rated 5/5 based on 3 review
Correctional Psychology - Ethics and Dual Roles: The Stanford Prison Experiment - Ethical or Not?