There is an objective moral law.
Kant claims that this is merely a tautology and cannot say anything about reality. In the end, Craig wants us to believe something that all reason is against, though paradoxically every apologetic assumes that we must take reason seriously.
Ignosticism The ignostic or igtheist usually concludes that the question of God's existence or nonexistence is usually not worth discussing because concepts like "God" are usually not sufficiently clearly defined. In the argument of the righteous, there is no middle term other than the truth.
Published in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First, he argues that such necessary propositions are necessarily true only if such a being exists: In these arguments they claim to demonstrate that all human experience and action even the condition of unbelief, itself is a proof for the existence of God, because God's existence is the necessary condition of their intelligibility.
Scottish philosopher and empiricist David Hume argued that nothing can be proven to exist using only a priori reasoning. In practice this school utilizes what have come to be known as transcendental arguments. This analysis would render the ontological argument incoherent, as the characteristics required of a maximally great being cannot coexist in one being, thus such a being could not exist.
Either this intelligible universe and finite mind so well suited to grasp it are the products of intelligence or blind chance. This is in contrast to material concepts, which can be verified by means of the senses.
However, since an assessment of the weight of evidence depends on the prior probability that is assigned to each worldview, arguments that a theist finds convincing may seem thin to an atheist and vice versa. Either this intelligible universe and finite mind so well suited to grasp it are the products of intelligence or blind chance.
Thus in Aristotelian philosophyGod is viewed as part of the explanatory structure needed to support scientific conclusions and any powers God possesses are—strictly speaking—of the natural order that is derived from God's place as originator of nature see also Monadology.
Apatheism An apatheist is someone who is not interested in accepting or denying any claims that gods exist or do not exist. This is a psychological argument. For the purposes of discussion, Richard Dawkins described seven "milestones" on his spectrum of theistic probability: They claim that the only possible proof for the existence of God is that the very same belief is the necessary condition to the intelligibility of all other human experience and action.
Agnosticism Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable. The Cosmological Kalam Argument:. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses michaelferrisjr.com arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing.
More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If that organizational structure is true, the. In the opening paragraph of the last section of the first Enquiry (XII) Hume observes that the central philosophical debate of his day was waged between “speculative atheist[s]” and “religious philosophers” over the question of the existence of God (EU/).
The Argument from Miracles Miracles have traditionally been taken as validations of religious claims. If the Bible is to be believed, then Jesus’ ministry was accompanied by miraculous signs and wonders that testified that it was God working through him.
In the course of a discussion on my personal blog about the existence of God and of the miraculous, an unbelieving reader (who strikes me as open to reasonable discussion) wrote me to say: "All I’m saying is that people everywhere demonstrate a powerful desire to believe that there is interventio.
It was Benedict Spinoza’s opinion that it was the regular and unchangeable order of nature that proved God’s existence (i.e., pantheism), not miracles which would contradict such an unchangeable order and thus undermine the idea of God’s existence (i.e., not a personal God who intervenes to sustain his creation).
And of course, the idea that the order of nature reveals the existence and essence of God leads straight to the view that nature is divine, and should be valued and even revered as such.A discussion of the idea of miracles and the existence of god